STRAIGHTALK CONTENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS

CMS Website Hosting - CMS Website Speed Optimization - HTML source code clean-up - w3c Validation - CMS Search Engine Optimizing

XHTML - HTML Code Validating all types of DOC validation: strict, loose, transitional, 1.0 - 4.01. Our service will validate Your source codes with "Section 508 accessibility" - "Code validator" - "CSS validation".

Below is a list of service We specialize in & provide

OTHER SPECIALIZED SERVICES
** STANDARD PRICING LIST
  • Full validation -    $99.00
    (site with (1) One layout)
  • Full validation -  $199.00
    (with (1-2) page layout)
  • CMS validation - $299.00
    (complete CMS site)
  • Additional Page - $49.00
    (sites with multi layouts)
   START YOURS TODAY

What We Do

XHTML & HTML Code Clean Up is the service of validating a Web Sites source code, based on an industry standard validation process. Our Clean up service will check Your site or web page for code validation errors with-in those areas high lighted below. We correct these errors and guarantee Your site a GREEN flag, on Your XHTML or HTML source code.

  • DOC
  • Meta
  • CSS
  • Javascripts
  • Codes
  • Links
  • Images
  • Flash movies

HOME· BLOG· ARTICLES· RSS FEED· GET QUOTE

What is Code Clean up or as best known "HTML Validation" ?

Code clean up or better known as HTML Validation is the process of checking your documents against a formal Industry Standard. Such as those published by the Worldwide Web Consortium (W3C) for HTML and XML-derived Web document types (DOC). It serves a similar purpose to spell checking and proof reading for grammar and syntax. Only that, it's much more precise and reliable than any of those processes because it is dealing with precisely-specified machine languages, not with nebulously-defined human natural language.

Why is Xhtml - HTML Code Validating so Important

1.) There is the very practical issue that non-valid pages are (by definition) relying on error-correction by a browser. This error correction can and does vary radically across different browsers and versions, so that many authors who unwittingly relied on the quirks of Netscape 1.1 suddenly found their pages appeared totally blank in Netscape 2.0. Whilst Internet Explorer initially set out to be bug-compatible with Netscape, it too has moved towards standards compliance in later releases. Other browsers differ further.

2.) Search Engines and Directories expect your code to be in proper order and in compliance with code validation. If your code has errors or is configured wrong it will either produce a poor ranking or no ranking at all among the popular Search Engines and Directories. Too often this is overlooked when it comes to SEO... Too much attention is on keywords and Meta-Tag programming. Our philosophy starts here!

All HTML coding programs add erroneous codes, unclosed tags or missing tags that are standard and go undetected... And you may be using a professional program like Dream Weaver or Front Page or some other popular HTML editor where you are led to believe that the HTML source codes are correct.... For the most part, from a design point of view it may very well be correct; however, search engine algorithms use certain criteria in searching for html source code and what they may see at your site may not be "palatable" to them...

3.) It makes everything run more smoothly... HTML, XHTML and CSS are specific in their use and when you meet their specifications the machine runs better and faster. Each of these protocols have a standard for use... It makes sense to use these standards to help aid in the use and advancement of these technologies.

There are three specific reasons, with answers. Why we should always validate our websites.

? The novice (or non-technical website owner) question: "my site looks right and works fine - isn't that good enough?"

? The perceptive observation "lots of websites out there don't validate - including household-name companies!"

? The strawman argument "validation means boring websites, and stifles creativity"

My site looks right and works fine ...

The answer to this one is that markup languages are no more than data formats. So a website doesn't look like anything at all! It only takes on a visual appearance when it is presented by your browser.

In practice, different browsers can and do display the same page very differently. This is deliberate, and doesn't imply any kind of browser bug. A term sometimes used for this is WYSINWOG - What You See Is Not What Others Get (unless by coincidence). It is indeed one of the principal strengths of the web, that (for example) a visually impaired user can select very large print or text-to-speech without a publisher having to go to the trouble and expense of preparing a separate edition.

It is perhaps unfortunate that the best-known browsers - Netscape Navigator and MS Internet Explorer on Windows - are visually very similar indeed in their presentation of many documents, differing only in trivial details like margins and spacings. The "same" browser on a Mac or Unix/Linux display will often look far more different.

Now that You have looked at Your site on Your machine (PC) try a Mobile, late version of any browser, or a Dial-up-Connection and then tell me what do You see then.... Sad isn't it!! Not what You have expected right. Validation is needed now and moreso in the future since all websites will have to validate sooner or later. Start Your business right from the begining & don't waste time and money which can be used for advertising on re-designing later.


But all those big sites don't validate!

Do remember: household-name companies expect people to visit because of the name and in spite of dreadful websites. Can you afford that luxury?

Even if you can, do you want to risk being on the wrong side of a lawsuit if your site proves inaccessible to - for instance - a disabled person who cannot use a 'conventional' browser? Accessibility is the law in many countries. Whilst validation doesn't guarantee accessibility (there is no substitute for common sense), it should be an important component of exercising "due diligence". It is now just over a year since a court first awarded damages to a blind user against the owners of a website he found inaccessible (Maguire vs SOCOG, August 2000). Their is 160 report on this issue, So You can get an Idea of Your liabilities....
QUOTED: From Joe Clark's report

For content creators, the lesson of this case is simple: Accessibility is easy, it is not optional, and if you keep ignoring it you may someday find yourself in court. If an organization as powerful as a national Olympic organizing committee - with effectively unlimited resources and, on the part of its paterfamilias, the International Olympic Committee, a century-long history of exclusion and inaccessibility - can lose a case like this, other cases resting on similar legal principles are likely to prevail.


Validation kills my creativity...

This is simply head-in-the-sand ignorance (indeed, it lies at the heart of the most spectacular hype-filled dot-com failures). Validation is fully compatible with a wide range of dynamic pages, multimedia presentations, scripting and active content, etc. It is part of the difference between doing it right and doing it wrong in a dynamic multimedia presentation, just as much as in a purely textual site.

It is perfectly in order for authors to express their creativity on the Web, though it is of course generally more appropriate to some sites (e.g. recreational ones) than to others (e.g. informational or functional sites like this one). But authors with creative ambitions should bear in mind that in any artistic field, you must start with a thorough understanding of the rules before breaking them. Otherwise you just look foolish.

Did You know that a FLASH MOVIE can actually show the viewer; TEXT, IMAGES, & LINKS automatically. Instead of an (X in a box) if The viewer's Browser doesn't have/support a Flash Player...

Did You know that the INPUT TAGS for all Online forms should carry, a LABEL TAG for those Physically Impaired "Blind or Deaf"

use this button to back to top of page